A moron judge (forgive the redundancy) in Ohio ruled that a patient did not have a right to the doctor advised course of treatment . . . for Covid.
Imagine the outcry if a doctor recommended abortion – the intentional killing of an innocent child – and a judge said no. What happened to all the BS rhetoric about it being “between a doctor, a patient, and God” and “my body, my choice”?
Maybe it was just BS rhetoric.
And the disingenuous irony of the judge overruling a doctor’s prescription and in the same breath noting that “judges are not doctors.” #insanity.
Talk about a sore loser!
Drowning in Liberal tears. Pro-aborts pitch a fit about Texas law. Lots of blathering about Justices that Trump appointed and – get this – the Constitution. Go figure. What this bed-wetting panty-waist pathetic excuse for a man doesn’t mention is that the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act (FACE) did essentially the same thing to prolifers back when Bill Clinton was in the Oral Office doing interns. #Karmababy.
The Supreme Court effectively overturned Roe vs. Wade with a 5-4 unsigned decision issued in the middle of the night Wednesday. The Texas state government created a legal end run around precedent to ban the vast majority of abortions in the state, and set up a massive incentive to suppress even the ones that are still technically legal. The court declined to stop it.
It’s legal Calvinball — five ultra-reactionary justices, one of whom occupies a stolen seat and three of whom were appointed by a president who lost the popular vote — ignoring all precedent and basic constitutional mechanics to stuff through an incredibly unpopular right-wing attack on reproductive freedom. And the legal mechanism they countenanced is even worse than the effect on abortion rights.
Read the rest of his hissy fit here: https://ca.finance.yahoo.com/news/supreme-court-just-effectively-overturned-201416160.html
Jen Psaki-al-Bagdadi: “Good news on the Afghan front, numbers needing evacuation continiue to drop.”
President Joe Biden: “Wow. Who saw that coming.“
Child Bride Alert: I guess this means the honeymoon is over.
Just yesterday, the Taliban’s new Press Secretary Jen Psaki-al-Bagdadi, “promised” proper treatment of women . . . “within the confines of Islamic law.”
On the same day – let’s just say he must have had his fingers crossed, The New York Post ran this headline:
Less than 24 hours later, we get this from NBC News:
New Taliban leadership borrow page from the Biden/DNC playbook.
The caliphate assures us that the days of public stoning and dismemberment of women are from the days of yore. “We are not your father’s Caliphate” is the new tagline.
Instead, Jen Psaki’s alter ego, spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid promised the Taliban would honor women’s rights, but within the norms of Islamic law, though he gave few details. Apparently channeling his inner Nancy Pelosi, he said, “We just have to embrace the Caliphate to know what the Caliphate is going to do.”
Think of it like the Democrats are really the friend of unborn children everywhere, as long their rights are withing the norms of the DNC’s position that “we’ve never seen an abortion we didn’t like.”
Yeah. “Very few details.”
Part Neville Chamberlain (to our enemies);
Part Fidel Castro (to US citizens)
25th Amendment anyone?
The Russian Kalashnikov AK-47 and its derivatives have long been the assault rifle of choice for militant groups because of their rugged design, but some Taliban fighters are trading them in for captured U.S. guns as Afghanistan’s government collapses.
Video and pictures published by the Taliban on Twitter and elsewhere show fighters carrying M4 carbines and M16 rifles discarded by Afghan army units. Other images show Taliban forces capturing abandoned government vehicles.
The U.S. guns are more accurate and have greater range than the their AK-47s, but on their own may not deliver much added capability on the battlefield.