qV0XS1r9J4lzsH4.AuisnXWe-VMT3oEBd8DOtNAZIB2VlwI

Gosnell’s murders are just the tip of the iceberg.

Kermit Gosnell – either by natural causes, the dispatch of a fellow inmate (conviction for injuring a child is not viewed favorably in prison), or through the vehicle of a lethal injection – will die in prison.  We’re off to a good start.

The abortion juggernaut is in the corner, saying Gosnell’s horrors are the exception.  People who kill children for a living will also lie.  That is the case here.

Life Dynamics just posted this video:

The practices Gosnell employed are commonplace.

The heinous nature of the practice does beg the question, why would they be.  Here’s my theory.

Back when abortion was declared legal, a baby born alive was truly an unintended consequence by abortionists.  That was the last thing they wanted.  A generation later, we’re more calloused.  But we also have a reference book full of medical complications (and malpractice decisions) that are the result of the more “traditional” abortion procedure: ruptured uterus, lacerated colon, infertility, retained fetal parts, damaged cervix.  The list goes on.

All (or most) of these complications are avoided – purely for the benefit of the abortionist – if he allows the baby to be born alive.  That is, he’s avoided having to insert very sharp instruments inside the woman’s body; he’s avoided the task of re-assembling the parts of the baby that he just dis-assembled.  Sure, mom might drop the soon-to-be-dead baby on the floor or the toilet or wherever.  But no matter.  Mom is more likely to be medically intact so he doesn’t have to deal with those pesky 911 calls or being summoned into court for his medical misadventure.

Doubtless, the media will do their best to ignore these rampant abuses, just as they did throughout the Gosnell trial.  Those enablers in the media, political office, and pulpits will share something else with Kermit Gosnell: an extremely unenviable position on Judgment Day.

May God have mercy on us all.